Section 216A IPC: Penalty for Harbouring Robbers or Dacoits

In this comprehensive article, we’ll delve into the intricacies of Section 216A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which deals with the penalty for harboring robbers or dacoits. This legal provision has far-reaching implications in the fight against organized crime and plays a pivotal role in maintaining law and order. We’ll explore the various aspects of this section, understanding its significance, the conditions under which it is applied, and the penalties that can be imposed. So, let’s embark on this legal journey to gain a deeper insight into Section 216A IPC.

section 216A ipc

Section 216A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) stands as a formidable deterrent against those who choose to aid and abet individuals involved in criminal activities, particularly robbers and dacoits. This article aims to shed light on the provisions of this section and its far-reaching consequences for those who engage in harbouring such offenders.

The Genesis of Section 216A IPC

Section 216A was incorporated into the IPC in 1973, recognizing the need for stringent measures to combat organized crime. The intention was to penalize individuals who provide refuge, support, or protection to robbers and dacoits, thereby facilitating their criminal activities.

See also  Section 211 IPC - False Charge of Offence Made with Intent to Injure

Defining Robbers and Dacoits

Robbers and dacoits are pivotal terms in this context. Robbers are individuals involved in theft using force or the threat of force, while dacoits typically operate in organized groups, commit violent crimes, and often target rural areas. It’s important to distinguish between these terms as Section 216A applies to both.

Acts Constituting Harbouring

Harbouring, as per Section 216A, encompasses various acts that involve hiding, protecting, or aiding robbers or dacoits. This may include providing them with shelter, food, or any form of assistance that aids them in evading the law.

Intent Behind Harbouring

It’s crucial to understand that the intent behind harbouring is a critical element in applying this provision. Merely unknowingly hosting a criminal may not lead to prosecution. The intent to support their unlawful activities must be proven.

Provisions of Section 216A IPC

Punishment for Harbouring Robbers or Dacoits

If an individual is found guilty of harbouring robbers or dacoits, they can be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, in addition to a fine.

Cognizable and Non-Bailable Offense

Section 216A is a cognizable offense, meaning the police can arrest the accused without a warrant. Moreover, it is a non-bailable offense, making it even more stringent.

Consent of the Public Prosecutor

Before initiating a prosecution under Section 216A, the public prosecutor’s consent is required. This adds an additional layer of scrutiny to ensure that cases are not misused.

Landmark Legal Cases

State of Maharashtra v. Mohd Yakub

In this case, the Supreme Court held that harbouring involves active support or assistance, proving the intent to support the criminals. Mere knowledge of the presence of robbers or dacoits does not constitute harbouring.

See also  Section 203 IPC: Giving False Information Respecting an Offence Committed

State of U.P. v. Hari Charan

This case emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. They must establish the accused’s active involvement in supporting the criminals beyond a reasonable doubt.

Significance of Section 216A IPC

Deterrence against Aiding Criminals

Section 216A serves as a powerful deterrent against those who might consider aiding robbers and dacoits. The stringent penalties associated with it discourage individuals from engaging in such activities.

Protecting Law Enforcement

By requiring the consent of the public prosecutor and making it a non-bailable offense, Section 216A safeguards law enforcement agencies against frivolous or mischievous cases.

Common Misconceptions

Some individuals mistakenly believe that mere knowledge of the presence of robbers or dacoits on their property could lead to prosecution. However, as highlighted in legal cases, active support and intent to aid are essential elements for prosecution.


Section 216A IPC stands as a robust legal provision, acting as a guardian of justice against those who choose to harbor robbers or dacoits. It plays a pivotal role in maintaining law and order and serves as a potent deterrent against aiding and abetting criminal activities. Understanding the nuances of this section is vital, not only for legal professionals but for society at large.

Frequently Asked Questions

The public prosecutor’s consent is required before initiating a prosecution under Section 216A, adding an extra layer of scrutiny.

Section 216A specifically deals with the act of harbouring robbers or dacoits and carries distinct penalties.

Exceptions may exist in cases where active support or intent to aid cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. However, it is subject to the interpretation of the courts.