Understanding Section 162 CrPC: Statements to Police Not to Be Signed

Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) in India is a pivotal aspect of criminal investigations and trials. This provision addresses the nature and handling of statements made to the police during the course of an investigation. The main thrust of this section is that statements made to the police are not to be signed by the person making them and their use as evidence in court is highly restricted.

This measure aims to ensure that the process of recording statements is free from coercion or manipulation, thereby safeguarding the rights of the accused and the integrity of the judicial process.

Bare Act. Section 162 Cr.P.C.
Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence.

(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made:
Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act , 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); or to affect the provisions of section 27 of that Act.
Explanation.--An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

The Importance of Section 162 CrPC

Section 162 CrPC is designed to protect the rights of individuals during police investigations. It serves as a safeguard against potential misuse of power by law enforcement officials. By prohibiting the signing of statements made to the police, this section helps to prevent instances where individuals might be coerced or intimidated into signing statements that may not be entirely truthful or voluntary. This provision underscores the importance of maintaining the credibility and reliability of the judicial process.

Provisions Under Section 162 CrPC

The key elements of Section 162 CrPC are as follows:

1. Prohibition on Signing Statements: Any statement made to a police officer during an investigation should not be signed by the person making it.
2. Restrictions on Use as Evidence: These statements cannot be used as substantive evidence in court, except under certain conditions.
3. Permissible Use for Contradiction: Statements can be used to contradict the testimony of a witness during the trial, provided the witness is given an opportunity to explain the contradiction.

Rationale Behind the Prohibition

The prohibition on signing statements is rooted in the need to prevent any undue influence or coercion during the recording of statements. It acknowledges the possibility of abuse of power by police officers and seeks to protect individuals from being compelled to make statements against their will. This measure also aims to ensure that the evidence presented in court is reliable and obtained through fair means.

Exceptions to the Rule

While Section 162 CrPC generally prohibits the use of statements made to the police as evidence, there are notable exceptions:

1. Dying Declarations: Statements made by a person who is on the verge of death can be used as evidence, given the belief that a person is unlikely to lie when facing imminent death.
2. Discovery of Fact: If a statement leads to the discovery of a fact, it can be used as evidence to the extent that it relates to the discovery.

Legal Precedents and Interpretations

Over the years, various court rulings have interpreted and clarified the scope and application of Section 162 CrPC. One notable case is State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyaya, where the Supreme Court held that statements made to police officers could be used for contradicting the witness but not for corroborating the testimony. This distinction is crucial as it maintains the balance between protecting individual rights and ensuring justice.

Impact on the Judicial Process

Section 162 CrPC has a significant impact on how criminal trials are conducted. By restricting the use of police statements as evidence, it ensures that trials are based on more reliable and direct forms of evidence, such as testimonies given under oath in court. This helps to prevent wrongful convictions based on potentially coerced statements and upholds the principle of fair trial.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite its protective intent, Section 162 CrPC faces certain challenges and criticisms:

1. Delayed Justice: The restriction on using police statements as evidence can sometimes lead to delays in the judicial process, as additional evidence needs to be gathered.
2. Reliance on Witness Testimony: The heavy reliance on witness testimony can be problematic, especially if witnesses turn hostile or are influenced by external factors.

Reforms and Recommendations

To address these challenges, several legal experts and committees have suggested reforms, such as:

1. Training for Police Officers: Enhancing the training of police officers to ensure that statements are recorded accurately and without coercion.
2. Use of Technology: Incorporating technology, such as audio-video recording of statements, to provide a more reliable record of what was said during investigations.

Conclusion

Section 162 CrPC plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the judicial process in India. By restricting the use of statements made to police officers and ensuring they are not signed, it protects individuals from potential abuse of power and ensures that evidence presented in court is reliable and credible. Despite the challenges and criticisms, the provisions under this section are fundamental to safeguarding the rights of the accused and upholding the principles of justice.

Frequently Asked Questions