Section 26 CrPC: Courts by Which Offences Are Triable

The judicial system in India is a complex web of courts designed to administer justice efficiently and equitably. Central to this system is the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), a legal framework that dictates how criminal trials are conducted. Among its various sections, Section 26 of the CrPC stands out as a crucial provision, determining the courts by which offences are triable.

section 26 crpc

Understanding this section is essential for legal professionals, law students, and anyone interested in the criminal justice system.

Bare Act. Section 26 Cr.P.C.
Courts by which offences are triable.

Subject to the other provisions of this Code,--
(a) any offence under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) may be tried by--
(i) the High Court, or
(ii) the Court of Session, or
(iii) any other Court by which such offence is shown in the First Schedule to be triable:
1[Provided that any 2[offence under section 376, 3[section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, 376DB] or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)] shall be tried as far as practicable by a Court presided over by a woman.]
(b) any offence under any other law shall, when any Court is mentioned in this behalf in such law, be tried by such Court and when no Court is so mentioned, may be tried by--
(i) the High Court, or
(ii) any other Court by which such offence is shown in the First Schedule to be triable.

Arunachal Pradesh.--
Amendment of section 26.--In the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereafter referred to as the principal Act), in section 26, in the proviso to clause (a), for the words figures and letters "offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code" the words, figures and letters "offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376AA, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, 376DA of section 376E of the Indian Penal Code shall be substituted.
[Vide Arunachal Pradesh Act 3 of 2019, s. 11]

Uttar Pradesh
In section 26 of the said Code, for clause (b), the following clause shall be substituted, namely :
(b) any offence under any other law may be tried :
(i) when any court is mentioned in this behalf in such law, by such court, or by any court superior in rank to such court, and
(ii) when no court is so mentioned, by any court by which such offence is shown in the First Schedule to be tribal, or by any court superior in rank to such court.
[Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 1 of 1984, s. 6]

1. Ins. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 4 (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).
2. Subs. by Act 13 of 2013, s. 11, for "offence under section 376 and sections 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)" (w.e.f. 3-2-2013).
3. Subs. by Act 22 of 2018, s. 10, for "section 376A, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D" (w.e.f. 21-4-2018).

Introduction to Section 26 CrPC

Importance and Relevance

See also  Understanding Section 245 CrPC: When Accused Shall Be Discharged

Section 26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is instrumental in delineating the courts responsible for trying various offences in India. It provides clarity on the judicial authority vested in different courts, ensuring that cases are directed to the appropriate forum based on the nature and gravity of the offence. This section’s importance cannot be overstated as it forms the foundation for an organized and systematic approach to criminal trials.

Historical Context

The CrPC was enacted in 1973, replacing the older Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898. This legislative overhaul was aimed at making the judicial process more efficient and accessible. Section 26, in particular, was crafted to address ambiguities and streamline the process of assigning cases to the appropriate courts.

Key Definitions

Understanding Section 26 necessitates familiarity with certain key legal definitions:

  • Offence: Any act or omission made punishable by law.
  • Triable: Capable of being tried in a court of law.
  • Jurisdiction: The legal authority of a court to hear and decide cases.

Jurisdiction and Authority

Hierarchical Structure of Courts

India’s judiciary is structured hierarchically, with the Supreme Court at the apex, followed by High Courts, Sessions Courts, and various Magistrate Courts. Each level of court has distinct roles and responsibilities, defined by the CrPC and other legal statutes.

Types of Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction can be broadly classified into:

  • Original Jurisdiction: The power of a court to hear a case for the first time.
  • Appellate Jurisdiction: The authority to review and revise the decision of a lower court.
  • Special Jurisdiction: Powers granted to a court to deal with specific types of cases.

Territorial Jurisdiction

Territorial jurisdiction refers to the geographical area within which a court can exercise its authority. This is particularly significant in criminal cases, where the location of the offence often determines the jurisdiction.

Types of Offences and Their Trial Courts

Cognizable vs Non-Cognizable Offences

Cognizable offences are serious crimes like murder, rape, and robbery, where the police can arrest without a warrant and initiate an investigation. Non-cognizable offences are less severe, such as defamation or public nuisance, requiring a warrant for arrest and court permission for investigation.

See also  Uncovering the Potent Powers: Section 35 CrPC and Judicial Successions

Bailable vs Non-Bailable Offences

In bailable offences, the accused has the right to secure bail, whereas in non-bailable offences, bail is at the discretion of the court.

Compoundable vs Non-Compoundable Offences

Compoundable offences are those where the complainant can agree to drop charges, usually involving minor disputes. Non-compoundable offences are more serious, and the state prosecutes the offender regardless of the victim’s consent.

Courts Empowered to Try Offences

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, as the highest judicial authority in India, primarily handles appeals and significant cases involving constitutional issues. It also has original jurisdiction in disputes between states and the central government.

High Courts

High Courts exercise jurisdiction over their respective states or union territories. They handle appeals from lower courts and have the authority to oversee significant criminal cases.

Sessions Courts

Sessions Courts are trial courts for serious criminal cases. They can impose severe punishments, including life imprisonment and the death penalty.

Magistrate Courts

Magistrate Courts are categorized into Chief Judicial Magistrates, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrates, and Judicial Magistrates of First and Second Class. They handle less severe criminal cases, with varying degrees of sentencing powers.

Special Courts

Special Courts are constituted for specific types of offences, such as anti-corruption, narcotics, and terrorism. They ensure that cases requiring specialized knowledge and swift justice are handled effectively.

Procedures for Triable Offences

Filing of FIR and Charge Sheet

The process begins with the filing of a First Information Report (FIR) by the police upon receiving information about a cognizable offence. Following the investigation, a charge sheet is filed in the court detailing the evidence and charges against the accused.

Pre-Trial Procedures

Pre-trial procedures include bail hearings, framing of charges, and preliminary hearings to determine the sufficiency of evidence for trial.

Trial Procedures

The trial itself involves the examination of witnesses, presentation of evidence, cross-examinations, and final arguments from both the prosecution and defence. The judge then deliberates and pronounces a verdict.

Post-Trial Procedures

Post-trial procedures may include sentencing, appeals, and revisions. The accused has the right to appeal to a higher court if dissatisfied with the trial court’s decision.

Special Provisions and Amendments

Amendments to Section 26 CrPC

Over the years, Section 26 has been amended to address changing societal needs and legal landscapes. These amendments aim to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial process.

Impact of Recent Amendments

Recent amendments have streamlined procedures and expanded the jurisdiction of certain courts, ensuring quicker resolution of cases and reducing the backlog in the judicial system.

Special Provisions for Certain Offences

Certain offences, such as those involving minors or women, have special provisions under the CrPC to protect vulnerable groups and ensure fair trials.

See also  Section 224 CrPC: Withdrawal of Remaining Charges on Conviction on One of Several Charges

Challenges and Criticisms

Delays in Judicial Processes

One of the major criticisms of the Indian judicial system is the delay in the disposal of cases. Backlogs in courts often lead to prolonged trials and delayed justice.

Jurisdictional Conflicts

Jurisdictional conflicts arise when there is ambiguity over which court should hear a case, leading to legal disputes and further delays.

Legal Ambiguities

Legal ambiguities and loopholes in the CrPC can result in varied interpretations, affecting the consistency and predictability of judicial outcomes.

Case Studies and Precedents

Landmark Judgments

Landmark judgments by the Supreme Court and High Courts provide valuable insights into the application of Section 26. These judgments often set precedents that guide future cases.

Case Analysis

Analyzing specific cases helps illustrate how Section 26 operates in practice and the challenges faced by courts in interpreting and applying this provision.

Future Prospects and Reforms

Proposed Reforms

Proposed reforms aim to address existing challenges, such as judicial delays and jurisdictional conflicts, by introducing measures like fast-track courts and digitization of court records.

Impact of Technology

The integration of technology in the judicial process, including e-filing of cases and virtual hearings, holds the potential to revolutionize the administration of justice in India.

Enhancing Judicial Efficiency

Efforts to enhance judicial efficiency include increasing the number of judges, improving infrastructure, and implementing best practices from other judicial systems.

Section 26 CrPC

Section 26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is a pivotal provision that outlines the jurisdiction of courts over various offences. It ensures that cases are directed to the appropriate court based on the nature of the offence, thereby facilitating a more organized and systematic approach to criminal trials.


Understanding Section 26 of the CrPC is crucial for navigating the Indian judicial system. It ensures that offences are tried by the appropriate courts, fostering a structured and efficient legal process. Despite its challenges, ongoing reforms and technological advancements promise a more streamlined and effective judiciary, ultimately upholding the principles of justice and fairness.

Frequently Asked Questions

The courts empowered include the Supreme Court, High Courts, Sessions Courts, Magistrate Courts, and Special Courts, each with its jurisdiction and authority.

Jurisdiction determines which court has the authority to hear a case, based on factors like the nature of the offence and the geographical location where it was committed.

Offences are classified into cognizable and non-cognizable, bailable and non-bailable, and compoundable and non-compoundable, each category triable by different courts.

Challenges include delays in judicial processes, jurisdictional conflicts, and legal ambiguities, which can hinder the efficient administration of justice.

Proposed reforms focus on reducing delays, resolving jurisdictional conflicts, integrating technology, and enhancing overall judicial efficiency.