Section 108A IPC: Abetment in India of Offences Outside India

In the complex landscape of legal matters, Section 108A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with a specific and crucial aspect – the abetment of offences outside India. This often raises questions and sparks debates on the extent of jurisdiction, the role of Indian authorities, and the legal implications involved.

section 108A ipc

In this comprehensive article, we’ll delve deep into Section 108A IPC, exploring its nuances and providing clarity on its provisions.

Understanding the Basics of Section 108A IPC

Section 108A IPC is a vital component of Indian criminal law. It pertains to situations where an individual, within the jurisdiction of India, abets the commission of an offence outside the country. This section plays a crucial role in ensuring that those who aid or abet in crimes that transcend international borders do not escape legal consequences.

The Elements of Abetment

Before we dive into the intricacies of Section 108A IPC, let’s briefly touch upon the essential elements of abetment in Indian law. Abetment involves actively encouraging, assisting, or instigating someone to commit a crime. It is categorized into various degrees, such as abetment by instigation and abetment by conspiracy.

See also  Section 147 IPC: Punishment for Rioting

Applicability of Section 108A IPC

Section 108A IPC applies when:

  1. The offender is within India’s jurisdiction.
  2. The offence occurs outside India.
  3. The offender abets the crime happening beyond Indian borders.

This section has significant implications for extradition, cooperation with international law enforcement agencies, and the prosecution of individuals involved in transnational criminal activities.

Jurisdiction and Challenges

One of the primary challenges in applying Section 108A IPC is determining the extent of jurisdiction. India cannot claim universal jurisdiction over all crimes committed abroad, and extradition can be a complex process. However, when the crime affects Indian interests or when there is a specific extradition treaty in place, Section 108A IPC can be invoked.

Extradition Treaties

India has entered into extradition treaties with several countries to facilitate the extradition of individuals involved in crimes abroad. These treaties provide a legal framework for cooperation between countries and the transfer of offenders to face trial.

Case Studies

To better understand the practical implications of Section 108A IPC, let’s explore a few case studies:

Case 1: Terrorist Financing

In cases of terrorist financing, individuals in India who provide financial support to international terrorist organizations can be charged under Section 108A IPC. This helps in curbing the flow of funds to such organizations and enhances global security.

Case 2: Cybercrime

With the rise in cybercrimes with international dimensions, Section 108A IPC is used to prosecute individuals involved in cyberattacks on foreign entities. This ensures that cybercriminals are held accountable for their actions, regardless of their location.


Section 108A IPC is a powerful tool in the hands of Indian law enforcement agencies to combat transnational crime effectively. It underscores India’s commitment to international cooperation in the fight against global criminal activities.

See also  Section 111 IPC: Liability of Abettor When One Act Abetted and Different Act Done


India’s obligation to extradite individuals depends on the existence of an extradition treaty and the specific circumstances of the case.

Yes, if the crime directly affects Indian interests or there is an applicable extradition treaty, individuals can be prosecuted without Section 108A IPC.

Section 108A IPC strengthens international law enforcement cooperation by allowing for the prosecution of individuals involved in transnational crimes.

You can find information on extradition treaties on the official website of the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.